What Parents, Teachers, and School Choice Groups Think of Education Department Cuts
The Trump administration’s decision to cut nearly 50% of the U.S. Department of Education’s workforce has sparked strong reactions from various stakeholders, including parents, teachers, and school choice advocates. While some groups have condemned the move as detrimental to students and educators, others have hailed it as a step toward decentralising education and empowering states and families.
The Cuts
On Tuesday, the Department of Education announced the termination of over 1,300 positions, with an additional 600 employees accepting voluntary resignations or retiring. The cuts are part of a broader effort to reduce the federal government’s role in education and shift responsibility to states.
The department plays a critical role in distributing federal funding to high-poverty districts, supporting students with disabilities, enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and managing financial aid programs for college students. The reduction in staff has raised concerns about the department’s ability to fulfil these functions effectively.
Teachers and Parents React
Teacher unions and some parent groups have strongly criticised the cuts, warning that they will harm students and disrupt education programs nationwide.
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), one of the largest teacher unions in the U.S., called the cuts “an attack on opportunity.” In a statement, she said, “Ten million students who rely on financial aid to go to college or pursue a trade will be left in limbo. States and districts will be forced to navigate funding crises without federal support, hurting millions of students with disabilities and students living in poverty.”
The National Parents Union, representing over 1,800 parent organisations, also condemned the move, stating, “Parents will not stand by and watch our children’s future be dismantled. We are ready to fight back.”
School Choice Advocates Celebrate
In contrast, school choice advocates have welcomed the cuts, viewing them as a step toward reducing federal oversight and expanding educational options for families.
The American Federation for Children, a prominent school choice advocacy group, described the cuts as a signal that “the bureaucratic state is coming to an end in America, ushering in a golden age in American education that is centred on sending education back to the states and parents.”
Similarly, the Centre for Education Reform praised the move, stating that it “paves the way for ensuring that remaining federal program dollars not restricted by statute are directed to follow students where they are educated, regardless of the type of school.”
Trump’s Vision for Education
President Donald Trump and Education Secretary Linda McMahon have consistently advocated for expanding school choice, including charter schools, vouchers, and other initiatives that allow families to choose alternatives to traditional public schools.
On Wednesday, Trump addressed the cuts, saying, “The dream is we’re going to move the Department of Education—we’re going to move education into the states, so that the states, instead of bureaucrats working in Washington, can run education.”
While most public school funding comes from state and local governments, the federal government provides between 6% and 13% of overall funding, according to a 2018 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
Political Divide
The cuts have highlighted the deep political divide over education policy. Democrats generally oppose school choice, arguing that it diverts resources from public schools. Republicans, while supportive of school choice in principle, are not uniformly aligned on the best approach, particularly in rural areas where options are limited.
During McMahon’s confirmation hearing, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska noted that school choice policies often fail to address the needs of rural communities. “It works if you’re in a city,” she said, “but in many remote Alaska districts, there is no choice.”
What’s Next?
The massive staff reductions at the Department of Education mark a significant shift in federal education policy. While supporters believe the cuts will empower states and families, critics warn of chaos and inequity in the education system.
As the debate continues, the impact of these cuts on students, teachers, and schools will become clearer. For now, the divide between those who see the move as an opportunity and those who view it as a threat remains stark.
What are your thoughts on the Education Department cuts? Share your views in the comments below, and don’t forget to subscribe to my newsletter for more updates on education and policy.
One thought on “Education Cuts: Reactions from Parents, Teachers, Advocates”